Eligibility and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Who can compete?
A: Students currently enrolled in an undergraduate, graduate, doctoral, professional, or law program, including students in military academies, on the date of the registration deadline are eligible to compete. There is no explicit major, coursework, or prior experience in cyber conflict necessary to compete, but successful applicants will be able to draw from their academic interest to formulate cyber policy.
Q: I'm interested in competing but I can't find teammates. What should I do?
A: If you attend Columbia University, please refer to this sign-up sheet to find teammates. For those outside of Columbia University, we recommend that you consult with your institution's relevant faculty and student organizations to find teammates.
Q: Are there any requirements on team composition? Do teams have to be from one department within a school?
A: Each team must include four students. Teams that register less than four competitors may be considered at the discretion of the organizers, space permitting. We strongly encourage schools to reach across departments to diversify their team’s specialties.
Each team should also recruit a faculty member to act as their team coach and mentor. While coaches are not required to take part in the competition event, their participation is highly encouraged to ensure that all teams have access to assistance in crafting their responses.
Q: How do I register?
A: To be considered for the competition, interested teams must submit all registration materials, including all team information, by the registration deadline of October 14th. After all registration materials have been received, teams selected to compete will receive invitations and competition materials.
Q: Can all registered teams take part in the competition?
A: Columbia University and the Atlantic Council reserve the right to limit the number of teams competing in the Cyber 9/12 Strategy Challenge. Should an additional review process become necessary, all registered teams will be notified as soon as possible.
Q: How is the competition structured?
A: Two-three weeks before the competition, all registered teams receive Intelligence Report I, setting the stage for the simulated cyberattack. The teams are given approximately two weeks to prepare their decision documents. The decision document due date, approximately one week before the presentation, as well as submission instructions will be included in the first intelligence packet.
The two days of the competition are divided into qualifying, semifinal, and final rounds. Teams advancing to the semifinal round will be announced at an evening reception, where they receive Intelligence Report II, further adjusting the simulated scenario.
In the morning of the second day of the competition, semifinalist teams present their modified policy recommendations, based on the evolved scenario. Teams advancing to the final round receive Intelligence Report III and very limited time to adjust their recommendations. In the afternoon of the second day, finalist teams present on a stage to a panel of celebrity judges. The competition concludes with an awards reception.
Q: Do teams have to stay for both days of the competition?
A: All teams that wish to participate for the second and third rounds of the competition must stay for both days. We encourage all teams to stay for the second day of competition to support their fellow students and take advantage of the programming that will run on Saturday.
Q: Is there a participant fee for the competition? Will meals be provided?
A: There is no fee associated with competing in Cyber 9/12. However, participants will have to pay for travel, stay, and outside meals. Lunch and breakfast will be provided on both days of the competition.
Q: What is the format of the competition?
A: During the qualifying round on day one, teams will deliver a ten minute oral presentation based on the decision document, followed by a ten minute Q&A round with the judges. Judges will then provide feedback and score the students based on their performances. The final score of the qualifying round will be a combination of the oral presentation score and the decision document score. At the qualifying awards reception, advancing teams will be given an intelligence report that further alters the original scenario.
During the semi-final round, advancing teams will deliver a ten minute oral presentation based on a new intelligence report received at the conclusion of day one, followed by ten minutes to answer direct questions from a panel of judges. Teams are given limited time to respond to the altered scenario, testing their ability to analyze information as a team and synthesize a response with limited preparation.
After the teams advancing to the final round are announced, the finalist teams will receive the third and final intelligence report, detailing further changes to the scenario. The teams are provided with a very short amount of time to use the new information to revise their policy responses. The finalists will deliver a ten minute oral presentation, followed by ten minutes to answer direct questions from a panel of judges.
Q: What tasks are part of the competition?
A: The competition encompasses tasks, both written and oral, that challenge students to respond to the political, economic, and security problems created by the evolving cyberattack scenario.
• Oral Cyber Policy Brief: Teams will be given ten minutes to present their policy recommendations, followed by ten minutes to answer direct questions from a panel of judges. More detailed instructions will be distributed to the teams selected for the competition.
• Decision Document: Teams will also be required to submit a “decision document” accompanying their oral presentation at the beginning of the semi-final competition round. The “decision document” will be two single-sided pages (one double-sided page) in length, outlining the team’s decision-making process and recommendations.
Q: Is there a required format for the oral briefing?
A: There is no requirement for the structure or format of presentations. Presentations are limited to ten minutes. Each team must decide how to best conduct their briefing.
Q: Can presentation aids be used for the oral presentations?
A: No presentation aids (e.g., PowerPoint, props, and posters) are permitted. Teams will not be allowed to use electronic devices such as cellular phones and computers during the competition events, when teams are presenting or answering judge questions. However, teams may use electronic devices such as cellular phones and computers during the breaks between rounds. Paper notes are highly encouraged at all times during the competition.
Q: Can teams use charts in the written brief?
A: No visuals can be used in the written brief.
Q: What sources can I use to prepare my responses? How should these sources be cited?
A: Sources and citations are not required for the decision document. If used, they will count toward the total page count.
Q: What prizes will be awarded?
A: There will be awards for the top performing teams based on score, as well as team awards for best written brief, best oral presentation, best teamwork, and most creative policy response alternative.
Q: What should I bring to the competition?
A: There are no restrictions on what teams may bring with them to the venue. However, during the competition rounds, no electronic assistance will be permitted. Teams are encouraged to use written or printed notes to help them during their presentations.